On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 04:25 AM, Peter J Bradstock wrote:
If you use Real for streaming, won't you be up for the costs of the
Real
streaming service? That was part of the licensing deal as I
understood it.
Per-stream licensing of servers, yes.
What's wrong with QT streaming? Well, it's not as good as Real IMHO
I'd like to hear more on why - have you tried QT6's MPEG4 &AAC yet?
It's free AND an open standard.
but better still, use WMV (WMV streams doesn’t it?) and you can
export .AVI from
Avid and use the free WMV encoder...kicks ass too. IMHO .WMV is much
better
at low datarates than Sorenson QTs and at a fraction of the cost.
Probably
in some ways less foolproof cross platform but if you re windows only
should
be no problem.
---
You are currently subscribed to avid-l as: avidmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to leave-avid-l-396C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Find answers to your questions in the archives:
http://www.avid.com/community/maillist/messagesearch.asp
For messages before May 2002, visit the archive at
http://archives.itg.uiuc.edu/avid/
-->
